Michael Allen Thu, Jun 11, 2020 7 min read

ID—>LXD: Moving from Instructional Design to Learning Experience Design

"What’s e-learning? Today’s definition of e-learning is so broad, the term has come to mean very little. e-learning can be everything from a pdf document distributed via e-mail to a complex, data-driven, simulation-based learning experience."

 

Your name is important to you, right? Imagine if everyone had the same name. The name wouldn’t mean anything to anyone.

What’s e-Learning?

Today’s definition of e-learning is so broad, the term has come to mean very little. e-Learning can be everything from a PDF document distributed via e-mail to a complex, data-driven, simulation-based learning experience. So when someone says, “We’re using e-Learning,” we know very little about their instructional program. We only know that it probably uses computers and the Internet for distribution. We know nothing about what kind of instruction or learning support they are providing to their learners.

Who are Instructional Designers?

Instructional Designers, “ID's" for short, are people tasked with developing instruction. That means they determine, among other things, a clear definition of desired outcomes, study the variance in likely capabilities of learners and their readiness to learn, and categorize the nature of the content. No instructional approach is appropriate for all needs, so IDs need to determine what’s best considering all these variables.

In a simplified diagram of the many tasks facing the professional ID, I’ve categorized target outcomes as

  1. Follow instructions
  2. Remember and follow instructions
  3. Perform expertly
Follow Instructions

For this lowest level of instruction, the ID only needs to prepare clear communications, perhaps in written, illustrated, or video format. YouTube provides helpful instruction at this level. During our COVID-19 lockdown, I’m remodeling my home workshop and finding a plethora of useful information on YouTube. But I have to return to some videos over and over again (when I can relocate them), because I can’t remember all the useful tips I’ve gotten, sources of products, etc. I only remember that it was there (somewhere).

The assumption made when selecting this level of instruction is that learners are capable of performing the tasks being described or demonstrated. They therefore only need information, a roadmap, and perhaps some tips. Of course, if the assumption is bad, this form of instruction fails. And as risk and/or complexity increase,  learners need to practice following instructions in a safe, perhaps simulated environment.

 

 

Remember and Follow instructions

It isn’t always practical to refer back to instructions when we’re performing tasks. Indeed, if paramedics had to layout instructions and check off each task as they worked to save us, such a lack of internalized information and honed skills could have fatal consequences. Most situations aren’t so dire, but we often need to be able to perform without real-time assistance. The appropriate form of instruction here is a combination of information and practice. And again, if risk or complexity is significant, practice confronting challenges in realistic settings becomes essential.

Perform Expertly

We don’t have to be experts in everything, but there are many cases where some level of expertise is of great value. We expect experts to make very few mistakes, perform efficiently, and find highly effective solutions to problems not specifically taught and perhaps never before encountered. At this level, learners need to experience many challenging situations, have the opportunity to take responsive action, and see the consequences of their actions. Practice in a wide variety of challenging situations is important at this level to impart an ability to recognize patterns and underlying causes in never-before-seen situations and perform a wisely-selected, well-executed response.

Experience. The Difference.

What becomes evident in this analysis is that, except for simple and safe tasks where instructions can be easily accessed in the situation, IDs need to be designing experiences for learners. The primary success of this design work depends on the effectiveness of learner experiences.

As noted in “design thinking,” Allen Interactions teams always focus on the learner and use interactions and content to support both the learner’s emotions and cognition. How is the learner feeling about learning this content in this way? What will the learner most appreciate every step of the way? How do we build the learner’s confidence? How do we intrigue them to learn more?

To communicate the necessity of providing experiences for learners, we here at Allen Interactions not only have our tagline Experience. The Difference., we have also dropped the job title of Instructional Designer (because it’s no longer definitive) and have adopted the title Learning Experience Designer or LXD! If you agree that the major design challenges focus on the learner’s experiences, we hope you’ll join us in getting the message out. Drop ID for LXD!

 


Strategies to Define and Evolve Your Talent Ecosystem

Presented by Elizabeth Lembke and Michael Hruska


Click here to learn more > or call 800.799.6280 for more information.

New call-to-action

avatar

Michael Allen

Michael W. Allen, our CEO, has been a pioneer in the e-learning industry since 1975. He was the innovative force behind one of the most successful authoring tools ever created, Authorware, and our recently launched authoring and publishing system, ZebraZapps. Michael Allen has nearly 45 years of professional, academic, and corporate experience in teaching, developing, and marketing interactive learning and performance support systems. He has led teams of doctorate-level specialists in learning research, instructional design, computer-based training, and human engineering. For decades, he has concentrated on defining unique methods of instructional design and development that provide meaningful and memorable learning experiences through “true” cognitive interactivity. He developed the advanced design and development approaches we have used at Allen Interactions for the past two decades, including CCAF-based design and the SAM process for iterative, collaborative development. Michael is a prolific writer, sought-after conference speaker and recognized industry leader. In 2011, he received ASTD’s Distinguished Contribution to Workplace Learning and Performance Award. In 2012 Michael was selected by The National Ethnic Coalition of Organizations (NECO) Advisory Committee as a recipient of the 2012 Ellis Island Medal of Honor. He holds M.A and Ph.D. degrees in educational psychology from The Ohio State University and is an adjunct associate professor at the University of Minnesota Medical School in the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health. Michael Allen was the director of advanced educational systems research and development of Control Data Corporation’s famous PLATO computer-based education system used around the world. He was the founder, and former chairman of Authorware, Inc. and also the primary architect of Authorware Professional, which was based on Allen’s extensive research on creativity and creative problem-solving. It became a groundbreaking authoring tool combining power and ease of use, and ultimately the industry standard. Authorware, Inc. merged with Macromind/Paracomp to become Macromedia, which was later acquired by Adobe.

COMMENTS