Subscribe

Your email:

More from Allen Interactions:

UpcomingWebinar
5myths(2)

 ZEBRAZAPPS

CS&DM(2)

WhitePapers(2)

Connect with Us!

Facebookdescribe the imagedescribe the image

e-Learning Leadership Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Love Your Learners

  
  
  

Angel Green

by Angel Green, Instructional Strategist

Today is Valentine’s Day – and this may sound a bit harsh, but I really don’t like this holiday. It’s not that I’m not a fan of romance, far from it. My problem with Valentine’s Day is that I believe every day should be seen as an opportunity to demonstrate your appreciation to those important to you. It should not be relegated to a single day.

Likewise, I believe every learning event should be seen as an opportunity to demonstrate your appreciation of your learners. Often, clients look to us to create a single course or two out of an entire curriculum of courses required for employees. And, while we certainly welcome the opportunity to develop these highly engaging, performance changing e-learning courses, I am often left wondering – what about all those other courses?

To me, it’s akin to nails on a chalkboard when I hear, “It’s just __________ training”  - insert Compliance, New Hire, Software, or any other topic which has a perceived expectation of becoming a boring, page turning virtual data dump.

Love Your LearnersMy suggestion is that in learning, as in life, you look for every opportunity to demonstrate your LOVE. For each training event you’ve been asked to create, LOVE your learners.

Listen

Take the time and really listen. It’s easy to jump to a training solution without trying to uncover the true learning need. Customer satisfaction scores have fallen? We will develop customer service training! But, if we just listen to learners, we might discover that leaders are micromanaging, the CRM software is cumbersome and service agents don’t feel empowered to offer solutions for service recovery.

Before you jump feet first into design, see if you can pull together a focus group, or even just send an email survey to the intended audience. Get real world input and you will be better equipped to develop a real world solution.

Observe

As an instructional designer, training manager or courseware developer – do you know what it’s like to drive from sales appointment to sales appointment, hearing a barrage of objections from potential customers while trying to meet a quota in order to get your paycheck? Do you know the pressure of quickly entering data into the software program while a customer is on the phone asking for a refund on their bill? Have you been out in the heat of summer standing on the side of the road estimating how many bolts you will need to use in order to complete a highway rail replacement while cars zoom by at 60 miles per hour?

Probably not, and yet somehow we believe we can create learning that will resonate with the audience. Do your best to observe learners in action – or enlist the assistance of someone who knows firsthand what it’s really like. We say it all the time, but quiz shows and themed games don’t work. To be effective in changing performance, training must be placed in an authentic context – one that feels familiar to the learner. When learners are placed in an authentic context, they recognize how they may actually use this training in their “real world.”     

Value their time

Has this happened to you? You’re at a party and someone asks what you do for a living. You share your profession and wait. The people around you start sharing stories of the horrible training they’ve had to endure. The e-learning course in which they clicked “Play” and waited for the sound of silence indicating they needed to click a button. The three days they spent locked in a room with rows of computers clicking through software they already knew. The time they were able to successfully complete an hour long training program in under five minutes, happily clicking Next after Next.  

Obviously, these are examples of time that was undervalued. In terms of high school economics, it’s a simple equation of opportunity cost. What is it your learners are giving up in order to complete your  e-learning course? Is your course worth their time? If not, then it wasn’t worth your time, your Subject Matter Expert’s time, the legal review time, the LMS implementation time, or the time at the printer. It was a colossal waste of time.

Value your learner’s time by creating training worthy of the sacrifices made to attend.

Evaluate the right thing

How do you evaluate whether a learner has successfully mastered the content? Is it a post-course assessment score of 80%? Will answering 8 out of 10 multiple choice questions correctly mean your learners, when faced with a situation covered in the training, will make the appropriate decision? Of course not! I’m sure you realize this, but somehow we all fall into the trap of believing the post-course assessment is a valid (and mandatory) evaluation of learning.

What makes for performance change is not answering 80% of questions correct on the post-test; it’s successfully completing a series of interactions in which the learner is challenged to make the best choice given the situation they have been faced with.

By evaluating decisions, not answers, you are better able to assess how the learner will act and react to real-life situations. And, when you think about it – that’s what really counts. When faced with an ethical or legal dilemma, will your employees know how to act? When given an objection from a potential customer, will the sales person know how to respond? Evaluating decisions and giving feedback based on choices makes for great learning experiences.

So, on this Valentine’s Day, I ask that you look at every training event as an opportunity to LOVE your learners. 

Comments

Thanks for the great post, Angel. It's always good to be reminded that the primary reason we're doing all that we do is because of those learners. I've definitely been bitten by the LOVE bug! Now...if we could just figure out how to make Flash dispense a box of chocolates to learners at the end of a course...
Posted @ Tuesday, February 14, 2012 1:28 PM by Doug Rice
This is a wonderful acronym to bring our focus where it should be: the end user. Thanks!
Posted @ Tuesday, February 14, 2012 3:59 PM by Meg Yanalunas
Hear, hear! I have this conversation on a regular basis with my clients and,unfortunately, sometimes with my colleagues. I understand that we want to please the customer by offering a solution but without some time spent on this part of the process what we do offer will miss the mark and that pleases no one, least of all the customer.
Posted @ Tuesday, February 14, 2012 4:43 PM by Dawn Adams Miller
Ditto on the acronym, but especially the emphasis at the end of the article regarding real performance change coming out of the learning event. Unfortunately, the best we trainers/designers can do is create these kind of scenarios in the class. I wish we could continue it in following evaluation, post event.
Posted @ Tuesday, February 14, 2012 4:48 PM by Paul Safyan
Two things in this blog have struck a cord with me and validated that we are moving in the right direction at work: I've recently been promoted to Instructional Design Manager for a curriculum line to ensure that all of the courses within the curriculum ring true as just that: a curriculum as opposed to just a bunch of courses grouped together. We're also exploring alternative modalities to teach, such as blogs, wikis, etc. And finally, we're reaching beyond the "classroom" (even with online learning) to increase/reinforce behavior change as well as assign accountability to the learner in regards to their own development. Testing is a small part of that, in my opinion. There are more aggressive ways of measuring whether or not a learner 'got it.' While we're not beyond a standard test yet, we're also making strides in ensuring the assessments are more robust, valid and reliable and challenge the learner so that we know *they* know.
Posted @ Tuesday, February 14, 2012 6:46 PM by Heather Porterfield
Thank you all for the feedback. I wanted to take a moment to respond back to some of the comments. 
 
Paul - you mention a desire to continue evaluation post event. While an ROI of effectiveness of learning is often difficult and expensive, we shouldn't discount informal feedback we can get post-event. Sending emails or surveys to recent learners can give you a feel for how they believe the training prepared them for real world events. Ask leaders opinions on how well employees were prepared for success post-training. Based on their feedback, you are better able to update learning events. Ask questions of recent learners and their managers - they'll be candid with you. Even if their candor is a bit difficult a pill to swallow, it's helpful.  
 
Heather - you are right that testing is a small part of evaluation, but I would challenge the word you used to describe what you are looking to know. It is so important to ensure you determine the learners can do rather than that they know. That is the ultimate test of learning :-) 
 
Posted @ Wednesday, February 15, 2012 2:04 PM by Angel Green
Angel: Thanks for your direct response to me. I feel special! Have you seen any Level 3-type inventories that you like in interviewing post-training? I do that, and I have gotten useful feedback, but I'd be curious if you know of ways to delve more deeply. My learners usually say something like, "the training was good as far as it went, but..." and the but usually refers to problem-solving or troubleshooting situations that are not commonly-encountered. Any thoughts?
Posted @ Wednesday, February 15, 2012 2:13 PM by Paul Safyan
Paul - I don't. And there is a reason for that...each project is unique, each performance challenge is different. Evaluation doesn't need to be an expensive undertaking if you ask questions that mirror the answers you received in designing your course.  
 
For those questions, I point you to Ethan Edward's white paper, "The 5 Most Important Analysis Questions you'll Ever Ask." When you get to the answers to these questions, you'll know better what to seek in post-training evaluation. It will be a richer use of your time(and the learners) than a Level 1/Level 2 survey. 
 
For each of the questions in the white paper, think of how you can use the responses you get to evaluate the learning you create?  
 
Some examples of questions that might come from using the white paper as a guide:  
1. What do you expect learners to be able to DO after training? 
*Can they do it now? how proficient are they? did learning not prepare them for something they are expected to do now? 
 
2. What are the consequences TO THE  
LEARNER if the learner fails to master the intended outcomes? 
*Have you experienced (INSERT CONSEQUENCE HERE)? What do you think could have better prepared you for dealing with (INSERT CONSEQUENCE HERE) 
 
3. Observe - How well do you feel the training prepared you for knowing how to ______ in a real word situation?  
*Looking back, are the little nuances or environmental challenges you face in your job that you wished had been included in training?  
 
4. What performance mistakes do new learners regularly make? 
*Are recent learners making these mistakes after completing training? 
For evaluating this, you may be able to use "real" data as well - if waste was an issue, has the amount of waste reduced? Software training - have calls to the Help Desk reduced on the processes taught in the course? 
 
5. Tools, Resources and Job Aids that performers use. 
*Do you find yourself referencing _____ on a regular basis?  
*What is most helpful of ________ resource? 
*What other resources do you find useful? 
 
I hope these have helped. Best of luck!!
Posted @ Wednesday, February 15, 2012 3:05 PM by Angel Green
It's important for our target audience that they know AND can do. So, I qualify my earlier statement:  
 
While we're not beyond a standard test yet, we're also making strides in ensuring the assessments are more robust, valid and reliable and challenge the learner so that we know *they* know...and can do.
Posted @ Wednesday, February 15, 2012 5:38 PM by Heather Porterfield
Angel: Thanks for your prompt response. The general questions here are very good ones, the kind of thing for which I was looking.
Posted @ Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:00 AM by Paul Safyan
Great reminder Angel! Much of what I'm constantly challenged with involve not having a complete understanding of the learner (outside of what they SHOULD be doing). That is, understanding what they really are like. What keeps them up at night? What do they respond to visually in their environment? What is it they do when nobody is looking? What words resonate with them (i.e. marketing-speak...or street-speak)? I often find myself in the position of "go develop XYZ in this format, with these interactions"..."don't worry about the audience...they NEED this...". Very sad are those days. Thanks again for sharing!
Posted @ Friday, February 17, 2012 1:58 PM by Brian Wrest
Comments have been closed for this article.