Subscribe

Your email:

More from Allen Interactions:

UpcomingWebinar
5myths(2)

 ZEBRAZAPPS

CS&DM(2)

WhitePapers(2)

Connect with Us!

Facebookdescribe the imagedescribe the image

e-Learning Leadership Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

A Fresh Look at Context in e-Learning Design

  
  
  

Ethan Edwards

by Ethan Edwards, chief instructional strategist

I think people sometimes have a hard time getting a real concrete sense of how powerful context can be in shifting the whole learning equation—especially in e-learning where creating individual learner motivation is so critical in creating the conditions for learning.  We at Allen Interactions use a model requiring meaningful context, appropriate challenge, relevant activity, and content-rich feedback to create instructional interactivity.  In shorthand, we define the context as the “framework and conditions” for the instruction or interaction.  As such, it can be the specific style or manner in which information is displayed, how the environment for interaction is revealed, or even how the instructional elements are introduced to the learner.  I know this might seem very vague, but its only vague in the sense that different situations may benefit from such varying contextual elements that it is impossible to say definitively “Context = X.”

By virtue of a couple of visitors to the barn (who I sincerely hope are permanent) I got a brand new perspective on how powerful context can be in completely changing one’s inclination toward learning.  If you are anything like me, pigeons are one of the more unpleasant creatures we come in contact with…they seem dirty, often unsightly, bothersome creatures significantly detracting from my time in any city.  “Rats with wings” they are often labeled with some truth.  My main interest in pigeons has been to avoid them and even, I’m sad to say, to wish them ill.

PiegonsWell, two pigeons have taken up residence in my barn. You can see them in the unfortunately poor quality photo of them perched on the ridgeline of my barn roof.  Seeing them in the country, in fresh air, cooing contentedly up high, in harmony with all the other animals flitting about is one of the most appealing sights I’ve had all year.  They are so beautifully gray and plump; the way they hang together is so endearing.  I can only assume that there is a nest tucked up somewhere high in the rafters.  I see them and I only want to learn more about them:  from whence they came, what they eat, what their nest looks like, what makes them coo so beautifully, how many eggs are in their nest, etc.

In reflecting on this, I have surprised myself in how drastically and immediately my attitude toward learning about pigeons has changed.  But what has happened to create this difference?  Absolutely nothing EXCEPT that a subject of which I have been aware but disinterested my entire life has been given a meaningful and appealing Context.  Context has the power to connect content to values, interests, motivations, attitudes—things that matter to the learner that will fuel individual effort and commitment to learning.

This may sound a little off the deep end, even for me, but I contend that this is a great illustration of precisely what context can do in e-learning to change content about which the learner cares nothing into something he is eager or at least willing to take seriously.

NYUMedical

Here’s a case study for illustration.  New York University Medical Center was implementing a new patient records system.  Part of the implementation required training nurses and other hospital workers on software procedures in the new system.  There are few things more tedious and unmotivating than typical online software training. Tasks are so often presented en masse, as a series of meaningless gestures to watch and repeat slavishly that add up to nothing useful. While probably true of nearly all fields, medical care providers seem to find this particularly off-putting.  They are motivated by providing life-saving care to patients, not putzng around on inconveniently-situated workstations.  They find learning software about as appealing as a subject for study as I find pigeons messing up a city sidewalk.

What they did in their training, though, is to provide a meaningful context.  Before each task the lesson illustrates a patient-centered context to draw in the learner’s interest--to touch their values, to link this content to existing passions and motivations.   Even though the content is still the relatively dry task of presenting and testing software procedures, this consistent context building for each task is truly an enabling feature to make learning much more likely in this target population.

Comments

The context seems to be a more and more complex concept than I usually thought it was. That makes it more interesting. 
 
It's not very clear to me the "meaningful and appealing context" Ethan refers about the pigeons. What I see is that something trigger the curiosity about them. If there is a "black box" triggering the curiosity and that black box is the context, I'm in trouble: we could not work on context until we find what's the black box. (Maybe it's just a misunderstanding of what Ethan tells us). 
 
I like this new vision of context as the power to connect content to values, interests, expectations. But I see the idea as an attribute of a good context and I haven't been able to identify the constituent elements of context. This is a topic on which I still working by trial an error. My next project about governance is going to have a context where drama is the main component. The idea is that we are going to engage workers in knowing the main policies of corporate governance of the companies by developing a dramatic story mixing romance, love, conflict of interests, manage of information etc. Is that idea a context for learning?
Posted @ Monday, July 11, 2011 9:54 AM by Carlos
Great questions, Carlos. 
 
What I meant by the meaningful and appealing context that transformed my view of pigeons, was that simply seeing them in the country, in a non-urban environment connected them concretely to the world of living things in nature in a way that they, at least for me, are oddly separated from the way we encounter them as vermin in the city. I care deeply about nature and about animals and thus this context appeals to my curiosity immensely. One would think that if I care so much I would have made the connection on my own, but I honestly admit that I hadn’t…and so sometimes our job as teachers is to make sure learners make these connections. Context can be variable among people, so one does have to try to really understand the motivations and values of one’s audience. This particularly context might mean much less to a person completely disassociated from nature. 
 
The insight for me, in this, was that in e-learning design we often settle for the “default” context, which is usually a meaningless “presentation” or “testing” context, neither of which is particularly motivating nor helpful in enhancing meaning. And almost as bad is pounding hard on a contextual hook that has meaning to the organization but none to the user (e.g., “We are required by law to document that all employees take 2 hours of diversity training.”) That may be the reason for the training, but it hardly is a context that energizes the learning process. 
 
Your dramatic approach to context very well may work, Carlos. As you develop it, though, be careful not to let the imagined context take over. I find that the best contexts, frankly, are those that are as realistic as possible and relate clearly to what the learner is really going to be expected to do. I don’t know exactly what kind of “Governance” you must teach, but I would be interested in developing context only to the extent that it gives you the opportunities to have the learners make the kinds of decisions and actions in the challenges your present that relate to the experience they will have on the job. The context shouldn’t add extraneous stuff with the idea that it will automatically be interesting. Extraneous contextual stuff is just as killing to the success of a project as extraneous content. The rule I always try to keep in mind, is that the #1 priority of your learners is to get done. Good context makes the learner feel better about the efficiency of the learning; bad context can make the learner feel like they are wasting time. 
Posted @ Monday, July 11, 2011 10:26 AM by Ethan Edwards
A terrific exposé on the importance of context in learning. Your analogy of the pigeons illustrates one of the more challenging parts of designing effective learning in a very simple, easy-to-digest way. 
 
Many of my most influential design insights come from the following question: "What do I want my learner's experience to be like?" This concept of "learning as an experience" guides my design process by keeping me rooted into the learner's mind, feelings, and actions. Of course, context is arguably the largest, most dominant part of an experience (maybe they're even the same thing!). The challenge, as Ethan states, is to build a context that creates one's desired "experience" while remaining grounded in reality as not to break knowledge transfer.  
 
For more on using Experience as a design guide, I highly recommend The Experience Economy: Work Is Theater & Every Business a Stage, by James Gilmore. 
 
Ethan, do you find yourself drawn toward any certain instructional strategies that lend well to constructed contexts? That is, simulations, games, role play, etc. 
 
Also, what methods do you use to carve out the right context? How are we to know what "matters" to our learners? This seems to be the golden question!
Posted @ Tuesday, July 12, 2011 1:12 PM by Jamie Catania
Great post as usual, Ethan. Maybe this is too simplistic but the question I always find myself asking is what does the learner need to do? This helps me, the stakeholders, and SMEs I work with focus on learner needs and counters the tendency to list what people need to know. The need to know list sounds like a good idea, but the list is often a very old list filled with old needs and pet peeves; and is often short on how to even tell if a learner now “knows”. Looking at learning in terms of what they need to do helps me to weed out the dreck and bring out the essentials. A learner is never hired to participant in training, they are expected to be able to do the job they are hired for.
Posted @ Thursday, August 25, 2011 3:54 PM by Eva Mecic
Comments have been closed for this article.