Subscribe

Your email:

More from Allen Interactions:

UpcomingWebinar
5myths(2)

 ZEBRAZAPPS

CS&DM(2)

WhitePapers(2)

Connect with Us!

Facebookdescribe the imagedescribe the image

e-Learning Leadership Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Be My e-Learning Valentine

  
  
  

 

Ethan Edwards

by Ethan Edwards, chief instructional strategist

Roses are Red,
Violets are Blue,
Carnations are sweet,
And so are you 

It’s strange how vivid my childhood memories are of Valentine’s Day in grade school. One day before the holiday, we all prepared by making and decorating a “post box” out of construction paper we’d hang in a row at the bottom of the chalkboard.  Then we’d spend the evening at home shuffling through the box of cartoon Valentine cards Mom bought at the Dime Store…perplexed about what to do with the cards that actually suggested a glimmer of sincere romantic feeling…matching ambiguity of affection with the range of friendship shared with the 25 kids in my class…knowing that you couldn’t just skip someone because he or she was a challenge to categorize.  And then on Valentine’s Day, opening the cards that got put in my post box, being alternatively embarrassed or amused or hurt depending on who gave me which card, (which were usually the same cards I’d just distributed—after all, everybody’s mom went to the same Dime Store—except for the one show-off who bought the Disney Valentines) while munching heart-shaped cookies and Hawaiian Punch.  Even though the day was marked by excitement and vivid experiences, by nightfall, most of my specific memories had faded as completely as my red kool-aid moustache.

valentine 10It gets a lot easier to deal with Valentines as we get older and actually have a special someone we relate to with affection.  No longer are we burdened with worrying about not overlooking anyone; we can be selfish about our sentiments—saying just what we want without worrying about how it might seem to people unattached to us.  Our expressions of affection become part of a greater, more continuous stream of love and support—just one statement in a more important extended conversation.  We even feel comfortable splurging on absurdly expensive chocolates or flowers.

Unfortunately, many of the inconveniences of childhood Valentine exchanges are what we face in designing instruction for e-learning.  We have a huge array of students with whom we need to enter into dialog.  Many times we don’t actually know much about them.  And the methods we have to communicate are often very limited (you’ve probably heard me claim that no matter how hard you try to avoid it, nearly every e-learning interaction you ever build will be a multiple choice question).  And while training is a discipline that requires extended contact, we often are forced to squeeze it into a very concentrated, short burst, funded with inadequate resources, so soon to be forgotten.

But it’s important to remember that the content, challenges, interactions, and reference resources we dole out through our designs are not perceived by the uniform and affectionate judgment of our own eyes, but rather through the diverse perspectives of myriad individual students who take our instruction.  They are constrained by rules outside their control, to engage in this ritual, hopefully expectantly, but certainly with some level of doubt.  Whether they feel welcome, supported, challenged, and inspired is a function of what we send them in our programs. So as you think about writing content and designing instruction, it helps to think of each of your learners as if they are those children from your childhood, each opening a Valentine, even if mass produced and expected, with his or her name on it, each with a sense that the designer thought of them when constructing the training.

Today I'm asking
If you'll be mine.
Please say “Yes,” readers,
Be my Valentine!

Comments

cute! :) very cool
Posted @ Monday, February 14, 2011 5:35 PM by Meg
This lyric text reminds me of one of the hardest lessons I ever had: avoid self-referencing. Many years I thought that what I liked was good and people liked as well. 
 
When we talk about learning, we have to value interests, expectations, learning styles, abilities and so on. However, when we distribute e-learning to large groups is not possible to meet the diferences among people. I tend to think that the intention to know the participants is just a good intention and, in my experience, the information gathered about them has few impact in design. 
 
The way we try to overcome this situation is hearing different voices: ideas from training departments, from departments related to the need identified, from SMEs, from designers. This way, I avoid self-referencing and taking many ideas into account increase the course capability to meet differences of participants. Could we go farther? I'll be grateful if you include any suggestions...
Posted @ Tuesday, February 15, 2011 7:29 AM by Carlos Serrano
Yes, I am loving being your valentine. Thanks for the memories. I plan to go back again and again as I develop. Cool prespective! 
 
Peace,
Posted @ Tuesday, February 15, 2011 10:27 AM by Trish
Carlos, I agree with you completely. When people talk about the differences between people with the expectation that somehow one e-learning piece is to miraculously meet those differences, I feel like it is an endeavor doomed to failure. There are simply too many ways that the learners may differ from each other. 
 
This doesn't mean, though, that the answer is to force all learners into one narrow prescribed path. What it tells me is that we need to look at what is universal about learners--that they like to be active, the like to do things that mean something, they like to be task oriented, they like to have control--and build uniform instruction that allows these things to be controlled by the individual. I think the simplest way to do this is the really focus on the learning activities (the instructional interactivity) that will occupy the learners attention, and provide a great deal of flexibility and user control in exactly how they go about meeting the challenges which those activities require.
Posted @ Tuesday, February 15, 2011 11:03 AM by Ethan Edwards
It is interesting to see the Zebra tool in action and consider the fact that it is built without HTML or Flash experience, and also to think what it might be like to try to build this in a variety of other rapid authoring tools. Some other rapid authoring tools could tackle this, but lots could not. 
 
Interesting to think about!
Posted @ Tuesday, February 15, 2011 4:48 PM by Matt Kurtin
Comments have been closed for this article.